Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT overturned PCIT's revision order under s.263 concerning multiple issues in a telecom company's assessment. Key rulings: Interest/penalty on delayed license fee payments held as revenue expenditure, being compensatory rather than capital in nature. Carry forward of accumulated losses under s.72A allowed as demerger conditions were satisfied. No s.56(2)(x) implications arose on business acquisition through court-approved demerger. Transfer pricing adjustment directive rejected as AO had followed jurisdictional High Court precedent. Claims regarding TDS on bandwidth charges to non-residents, s.14A disallowance, depreciation verification, and s.269SS compliance were found to have been adequately examined during original assessment. ITAT emphasized that PCIT's revision powers cannot be exercised where AO has conducted proper inquiry, even if conclusions differ.
ITAT overturned PCIT's revision order under s.263 concerning multiple issues in a telecom company's assessment. Key rulings: Interest/penalty on delayed license fee payments held as revenue expenditure, being compensatory rather than capital in nature. Carry forward of accumulated losses under s.72A allowed as demerger conditions were satisfied. No s.56(2)(x) implications arose on business acquisition through court-approved demerger. Transfer pricing adjustment directive rejected as AO had followed jurisdictional High Court precedent. Claims regarding TDS on bandwidth charges to non-residents, s.14A disallowance, depreciation verification, and s.269SS compliance were found to have been adequately examined during original assessment. ITAT emphasized that PCIT's revision powers cannot be exercised where AO has conducted proper inquiry, even if conclusions differ.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.