Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT affirmed CIT(A)'s directive to grant TDS credit per Form 26AS despite taxpayer's initial failure to claim full credit in tax return due to software technical issues. Taxpayer had deducted Rs. 1,32,68,202 but system only uploaded Rs. 52,95,646. AO was instructed to verify and allow credit under Section 199 as no evidence suggested incomplete tax deposit. However, ITAT rejected taxpayer's claim for interest on delayed refund since taxpayer hadn't initially claimed full credit or promptly notified authorities about technical issues. Tribunal emphasized that taxpayers shouldn't face harassment due to technical glitches while maintaining proper verification procedures for tax credits.
ITAT affirmed CIT(A)'s directive to grant TDS credit per Form 26AS despite taxpayer's initial failure to claim full credit in tax return due to software technical issues. Taxpayer had deducted Rs. 1,32,68,202 but system only uploaded Rs. 52,95,646. AO was instructed to verify and allow credit under Section 199 as no evidence suggested incomplete tax deposit. However, ITAT rejected taxpayer's claim for interest on delayed refund since taxpayer hadn't initially claimed full credit or promptly notified authorities about technical issues. Tribunal emphasized that taxpayers shouldn't face harassment due to technical glitches while maintaining proper verification procedures for tax credits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.