Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
HC ruled that tax authorities cannot retain excess deposits made during appellate proceedings when final assessment is lower than deposited amount. Such retention constitutes unjust enrichment and violates Articles 14 and 265 of Constitution. Authorities directed to refund excess amounts for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15 with 9% interest from 09.01.2021 until payment. Additionally ordered Rs. 2,00,000 as costs for wrongful retention over four years. Both refund and costs payable within six weeks of order receipt. Court emphasized that retention of excess deposits beyond actual tax liability violates constitutional principles of equality and taxation authority.
HC ruled that tax authorities cannot retain excess deposits made during appellate proceedings when final assessment is lower than deposited amount. Such retention constitutes unjust enrichment and violates Articles 14 and 265 of Constitution. Authorities directed to refund excess amounts for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15 with 9% interest from 09.01.2021 until payment. Additionally ordered Rs. 2,00,000 as costs for wrongful retention over four years. Both refund and costs payable within six weeks of order receipt. Court emphasized that retention of excess deposits beyond actual tax liability violates constitutional principles of equality and taxation authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
