Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed taxpayer's appeal regarding Foreign Tax Credit denial under India-Denmark DTAA. While Form 67 was filed after ROI submission deadline under s.139(1), ITAT held that AO's rejection solely on delayed filing was improper. Matter remanded to AO for fresh examination of whether taxes were paid in Denmark on same income taxed in India, and if no relief was claimed in Denmark. AO directed to verify facts and decide FTC eligibility per CBDT circular and applicable precedents, rather than reject purely on procedural grounds. Technical breach in Form 67 filing timeline should not defeat substantive DTAA benefit if double taxation occurred.
ITAT allowed taxpayer's appeal regarding Foreign Tax Credit denial under India-Denmark DTAA. While Form 67 was filed after ROI submission deadline under s.139(1), ITAT held that AO's rejection solely on delayed filing was improper. Matter remanded to AO for fresh examination of whether taxes were paid in Denmark on same income taxed in India, and if no relief was claimed in Denmark. AO directed to verify facts and decide FTC eligibility per CBDT circular and applicable precedents, rather than reject purely on procedural grounds. Technical breach in Form 67 filing timeline should not defeat substantive DTAA benefit if double taxation occurred.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
