Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
ITAT upheld disallowance of interest payments under s.40(a)(ia) due to non-deduction of TDS on payments made to NBFCs. Appellant's contention that NBFCs were considered banks was rejected, as ignorance of law is not a valid defense. The tribunal noted appellant's failure to submit Form 27BA certification regarding payments and statutory deductions. Additionally, lump sum expense disallowances were sustained due to assessee's inability to maintain proper records or provide evidence of business purpose for vehicle and telephone expenses. The tribunal also confirmed penalty under s.271AAB(1)(c), finding no grounds for interference with the penalty order following dismissal of quantum assessment appeal.
ITAT upheld disallowance of interest payments under s.40(a)(ia) due to non-deduction of TDS on payments made to NBFCs. Appellant's contention that NBFCs were considered banks was rejected, as ignorance of law is not a valid defense. The tribunal noted appellant's failure to submit Form 27BA certification regarding payments and statutory deductions. Additionally, lump sum expense disallowances were sustained due to assessee's inability to maintain proper records or provide evidence of business purpose for vehicle and telephone expenses. The tribunal also confirmed penalty under s.271AAB(1)(c), finding no grounds for interference with the penalty order following dismissal of quantum assessment appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
