PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
ITAT upheld disallowance of interest payments under s.40(a)(ia) due to non-deduction of TDS on payments made to NBFCs. Appellant's contention that NBFCs were considered banks was rejected, as ignorance of law is not a valid defense. The tribunal noted appellant's failure to submit Form 27BA certification regarding payments and statutory deductions. Additionally, lump sum expense disallowances were sustained due to assessee's inability to maintain proper records or provide evidence of business purpose for vehicle and telephone expenses. The tribunal also confirmed penalty under s.271AAB(1)(c), finding no grounds for interference with the penalty order following dismissal of quantum assessment appeal.
ITAT upheld disallowance of interest payments under s.40(a)(ia) due to non-deduction of TDS on payments made to NBFCs. Appellant's contention that NBFCs were considered banks was rejected, as ignorance of law is not a valid defense. The tribunal noted appellant's failure to submit Form 27BA certification regarding payments and statutory deductions. Additionally, lump sum expense disallowances were sustained due to assessee's inability to maintain proper records or provide evidence of business purpose for vehicle and telephone expenses. The tribunal also confirmed penalty under s.271AAB(1)(c), finding no grounds for interference with the penalty order following dismissal of quantum assessment appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
