Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC upheld revision under s.263 regarding treatment of provision for doubtful debts in computing book profits under s.115-JB. AO's acceptance of assessee's claim was mechanical, without examining why provision for doubtful assets was claimed as deduction despite not being debited to provision account. Amount was merely shown as reduction from trade receivables for disclosure, not as written-off debts. Assessee maintained recovery hopes. PCIT's jurisdiction exercise directing re-examination was justified. Tribunal correctly analyzed legal position, finding no illegality in CIT's order. HC found no jurisdictional infirmity, ruling against assessee's appeal.
HC upheld revision under s.263 regarding treatment of provision for doubtful debts in computing book profits under s.115-JB. AO's acceptance of assessee's claim was mechanical, without examining why provision for doubtful assets was claimed as deduction despite not being debited to provision account. Amount was merely shown as reduction from trade receivables for disclosure, not as written-off debts. Assessee maintained recovery hopes. PCIT's jurisdiction exercise directing re-examination was justified. Tribunal correctly analyzed legal position, finding no illegality in CIT's order. HC found no jurisdictional infirmity, ruling against assessee's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
