Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
HC addressed payment procedures for GST demands under rule 142. Petitioner paid demand through Form GST DRC-03 instead of required electronic liability register Form GST PMT-01. Following recent amendment via notification 12/24 introducing rule 142(2B), petitioner permitted to file Form GST DRC-03A electronically to transfer payment credit to electronic liability register. Court directed that if petitioner files refund application under Section 54, authorities must process and refund amount to electronic cash/credit ledger within two weeks. Petition disposed with directive to follow amended procedure for payment adjustment through proper forms.
HC addressed payment procedures for GST demands under rule 142. Petitioner paid demand through Form GST DRC-03 instead of required electronic liability register Form GST PMT-01. Following recent amendment via notification 12/24 introducing rule 142(2B), petitioner permitted to file Form GST DRC-03A electronically to transfer payment credit to electronic liability register. Court directed that if petitioner files refund application under Section 54, authorities must process and refund amount to electronic cash/credit ledger within two weeks. Petition disposed with directive to follow amended procedure for payment adjustment through proper forms.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.