Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
HC condoned a 35-day delay in filing GST appeal, emphasizing that procedural delays should not override substantive justice. The petitioner had demonstrated compliance by depositing 10% of tax liability and making additional payments toward disputed amount. Court found strict application of GST Act's limitation provisions unwarranted given circumstances. Matter remanded to second respondent for fresh consideration on merits, directing full examination of facts and circumstances. Decision underscores judicial preference for substantive resolution over procedural dismissal in tax matters where appellant shows good faith compliance efforts.
HC condoned a 35-day delay in filing GST appeal, emphasizing that procedural delays should not override substantive justice. The petitioner had demonstrated compliance by depositing 10% of tax liability and making additional payments toward disputed amount. Court found strict application of GST Act's limitation provisions unwarranted given circumstances. Matter remanded to second respondent for fresh consideration on merits, directing full examination of facts and circumstances. Decision underscores judicial preference for substantive resolution over procedural dismissal in tax matters where appellant shows good faith compliance efforts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
