Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Reasoned adjudication requires consideration of replies; order quashed for non-application of mind and fresh hearing permitted.
    Natural justice in writ jurisdiction: non-speaking GST demand order set aside despite availability of appeal.
    Writ jurisdiction cannot bypass mandatory pre-deposit once the GSTAT is functional and appeals are available.
    Writ relief against show cause notices is available where jurisdiction is absent and concluded advance rulings cannot be reopened without fresh fraud ...
    GST refund rejection without deficiency memo was invalid; fresh consideration ordered under prescribed refund procedure.
    Grounds of arrest must be furnished as required by law; defective arrest memo cannot sustain detention or remand.
    GST registration cancellation set aside for mismatch between show cause notice and final order, with non-application of mind found.
    Condonation of delay in GST appeal: writ relief granted where filing was prevented by circumstances beyond the assessee's control.
    Parity in bail and documentary evidence supported release where no custodial remand was sought.
    Section 129 timelines are directory, not mandatory; delayed detention proceedings survive, while goods may be released on penalty deposit.
    Writ jurisdiction can condone delay in a statutory appeal when statutory limitation would cause grave prejudice.
    Writ jurisdiction and judicial restraint upheld: refusal to issue mandamus in disputed tax evasion allegations sustained.
    Summary processing cannot disallow a debatable ESI and EPF deduction claim under prima facie adjustment.
    Make available test under India-UK DTAA: intra-group support services were not fees for technical services.
    Vague reasons for reopening beyond four years cannot replace recorded failure to disclose material facts; reassessment notice quashed.
    Registered sale deed and banking evidence supported capital gains reinvestment claim; unexplained money additions were deleted.
    Unsigned transfer pricing order held non est in law, leading to quashing of the assessments.
    ITAT on revenue recognition, notional interest, and business deductions: verified claims, no exempt-income disallowance, and selective remands.
    Invalid scrutiny notice, earlier transfer of property, and mercantile accrual rule led ITAT to delete additions and quash assessment.
    Agricultural income from leased land, genuine trade liabilities, and no cessation of liability were upheld in this tax dispute.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

HC dismissed petition challenging Income Tax Department's...

Income Tax Department's Inquiry Into Alleged Cash Transactions Upheld as Matrimonial Dispute Falls Outside Tax Framework

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Income Tax February 25, 2025 Case Laws HC
HC dismissed petition challenging Income Tax Department's inquiry into alleged illegal cash transactions. Petitioner failed to establish violation of fundamental or statutory rights, with dispute primarily rooted in matrimonial conflict between petitioner and respondent. Court determined case involved complex factual disputes beyond Income Tax Department's jurisdiction and unsuitable for adjudication under Article 226. Complaint lacked statutory basis under Income Tax Act, 1961, with no formal regulatory mechanism invoked. Absence of legal framework for complaint submission rendered claims of rights violation non-existent. Court found no merit in arguments regarding department's non-response to complaint given its non-statutory nature.

Topics

Acts Income Tax