Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Condonation of delay permits statutory appeal restoration where inadequate service explanation prevented consideration of reassessment and taxable-inc...
ITAT ruled in favor of assessee regarding additions under s.43CA concerning sale of 12 flats below market value. While market value exceeded agreement value at registration, documentation proved agreement values were compliant with market rates at booking time. ITAT emphasized that mere auditor observations about lower sale values cannot justify additions without considering Act provisions. Since assessee received partial consideration as advance per original agreements and executed sales based on those values despite subsequent market appreciation, no additions were warranted under s.43CA(3) and (4). The significant time gap between booking and registration dates explained the apparent value discrepancy.
ITAT ruled in favor of assessee regarding additions under s.43CA concerning sale of 12 flats below market value. While market value exceeded agreement value at registration, documentation proved agreement values were compliant with market rates at booking time. ITAT emphasized that mere auditor observations about lower sale values cannot justify additions without considering Act provisions. Since assessee received partial consideration as advance per original agreements and executed sales based on those values despite subsequent market appreciation, no additions were warranted under s.43CA(3) and (4). The significant time gap between booking and registration dates explained the apparent value discrepancy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
