Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
SC granted bail to appellant charged under Section 3 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act after considering prolonged custody exceeding one year and likelihood of extended trial duration with 225 witnesses pending examination. Following precedent in V.Senthil Balaji case, court determined continued detention would violate Article 21 right to speedy trial. Distinguished from Kanhaiya Prasad case where different factual matrix existed. Appellant directed to appear before Special Court within one week for release on bail with conditions including regular court attendance, cooperation for expedited proceedings, and passport surrender. Special Court tasked with imposing appropriate terms to ensure compliance and case progression.
SC granted bail to appellant charged under Section 3 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act after considering prolonged custody exceeding one year and likelihood of extended trial duration with 225 witnesses pending examination. Following precedent in V.Senthil Balaji case, court determined continued detention would violate Article 21 right to speedy trial. Distinguished from Kanhaiya Prasad case where different factual matrix existed. Appellant directed to appear before Special Court within one week for release on bail with conditions including regular court attendance, cooperation for expedited proceedings, and passport surrender. Special Court tasked with imposing appropriate terms to ensure compliance and case progression.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
