Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
CESTAT allowed the appeal regarding refund of unutilized accumulated CENVAT credit. Department's rejection of refund claim citing ineligible input services under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was overturned. The Tribunal held that without invoking Rule 14, refund under Rule 5 cannot be denied. Following precedents, CESTAT emphasized that different criteria cannot be applied for credit allowance versus refund processing. When credit availed remains unchallenged, assessee is entitled to refund under Rule 5 read with Notification No.27/2012-CE(NT). The eligibility of input services cannot be questioned during refund sanction if not challenged at time of availing credit. Impugned order set aside.
CESTAT allowed the appeal regarding refund of unutilized accumulated CENVAT credit. Department's rejection of refund claim citing ineligible input services under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was overturned. The Tribunal held that without invoking Rule 14, refund under Rule 5 cannot be denied. Following precedents, CESTAT emphasized that different criteria cannot be applied for credit allowance versus refund processing. When credit availed remains unchallenged, assessee is entitled to refund under Rule 5 read with Notification No.27/2012-CE(NT). The eligibility of input services cannot be questioned during refund sanction if not challenged at time of availing credit. Impugned order set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
