Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT allowed the appeal regarding refund of unutilized accumulated CENVAT credit. Department's rejection of refund claim citing ineligible input services under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was overturned. The Tribunal held that without invoking Rule 14, refund under Rule 5 cannot be denied. Following precedents, CESTAT emphasized that different criteria cannot be applied for credit allowance versus refund processing. When credit availed remains unchallenged, assessee is entitled to refund under Rule 5 read with Notification No.27/2012-CE(NT). The eligibility of input services cannot be questioned during refund sanction if not challenged at time of availing credit. Impugned order set aside.
CESTAT allowed the appeal regarding refund of unutilized accumulated CENVAT credit. Department's rejection of refund claim citing ineligible input services under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was overturned. The Tribunal held that without invoking Rule 14, refund under Rule 5 cannot be denied. Following precedents, CESTAT emphasized that different criteria cannot be applied for credit allowance versus refund processing. When credit availed remains unchallenged, assessee is entitled to refund under Rule 5 read with Notification No.27/2012-CE(NT). The eligibility of input services cannot be questioned during refund sanction if not challenged at time of availing credit. Impugned order set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.