Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC held that rejection of eligibility certificates under Industrial Policy 2008 was unjustified. The conflicting assessments between Industries Department (claiming units non-functioning) and Finance Department (assessing operational turnover) demonstrated administrative inconsistency. Court applied doctrine of promissory estoppel, ruling government must honor policy promises relied upon by industrial units. The State Level Committee must reconsider eligibility applications since tax assessments proved units were operational. Finance Department's assessments during pending eligibility applications were procedurally improper. Court directed issuance of eligibility certificates and corresponding tax benefits, including necessary refunds and adjustments, to qualifying units that commenced production within policy period.
HC held that rejection of eligibility certificates under Industrial Policy 2008 was unjustified. The conflicting assessments between Industries Department (claiming units non-functioning) and Finance Department (assessing operational turnover) demonstrated administrative inconsistency. Court applied doctrine of promissory estoppel, ruling government must honor policy promises relied upon by industrial units. The State Level Committee must reconsider eligibility applications since tax assessments proved units were operational. Finance Department's assessments during pending eligibility applications were procedurally improper. Court directed issuance of eligibility certificates and corresponding tax benefits, including necessary refunds and adjustments, to qualifying units that commenced production within policy period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
