Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
SC held that unregistered sale deeds cannot transfer property ownership under Section 54 of Transfer of Property Act, even with possession transfer and payment. The case involved multiple unregistered transfers of a secured asset, including basement portions. The court emphasized that conveyance occurs only upon deed registration per Section 17 of Registration Act. Additionally, the court reaffirmed that public auctions cannot be invalidated without proof of material irregularity, illegality, fraud, or collusion. The SC overturned the HC's order, confirming that ownership remains with the original holder until proper registration, regardless of attempted transfers through unregistered documents. The appeal was allowed, upholding the validity of the bank's auction process.
SC held that unregistered sale deeds cannot transfer property ownership under Section 54 of Transfer of Property Act, even with possession transfer and payment. The case involved multiple unregistered transfers of a secured asset, including basement portions. The court emphasized that conveyance occurs only upon deed registration per Section 17 of Registration Act. Additionally, the court reaffirmed that public auctions cannot be invalidated without proof of material irregularity, illegality, fraud, or collusion. The SC overturned the HC's order, confirming that ownership remains with the original holder until proper registration, regardless of attempted transfers through unregistered documents. The appeal was allowed, upholding the validity of the bank's auction process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
