Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT upheld rejection of appellant's belated claim for interest payments in liquidation proceedings. Appellant failed to file claims within prescribed timeline and later attempted to add interest component after two years from supply date. Court found interest claim was an afterthought, not included in original documentation. Appellant's attempt to circumvent Section 42 of IBC by filing under Section 60(5) was rejected. Liquidator's actions in seeking NOC for settling sub-contractor claims were deemed appropriate within scope of duties. Key principles established: claims must be filed within timeline, interest claims must be part of original submission, and Liquidator's decisions are final if not challenged within 14 days under Section 42. Appeal dismissed with no grounds for interference with impugned order.
NCLAT upheld rejection of appellant's belated claim for interest payments in liquidation proceedings. Appellant failed to file claims within prescribed timeline and later attempted to add interest component after two years from supply date. Court found interest claim was an afterthought, not included in original documentation. Appellant's attempt to circumvent Section 42 of IBC by filing under Section 60(5) was rejected. Liquidator's actions in seeking NOC for settling sub-contractor claims were deemed appropriate within scope of duties. Key principles established: claims must be filed within timeline, interest claims must be part of original submission, and Liquidator's decisions are final if not challenged within 14 days under Section 42. Appeal dismissed with no grounds for interference with impugned order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.