Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT ruled on multiple service tax and CENVAT credit issues. CENVAT credit was denied on invoices from unregistered premises as they failed to demonstrate output service activities. Credit claims on architect, event management, and other services were remanded for nexus verification. Training kit sales tax demand was remanded to examine VAT payments. Software sales tax demand required further scrutiny of agreements and VAT documentation. SEZ services exemption under Notification 4/2004 needed verification of authorized operations. Extended limitation period was rejected as no suppression was proven given timely return filing and document submissions. Penalties under Section 78 of Finance Act were set aside. Appeal partially allowed with specific issues remanded for fresh examination.
CESTAT ruled on multiple service tax and CENVAT credit issues. CENVAT credit was denied on invoices from unregistered premises as they failed to demonstrate output service activities. Credit claims on architect, event management, and other services were remanded for nexus verification. Training kit sales tax demand was remanded to examine VAT payments. Software sales tax demand required further scrutiny of agreements and VAT documentation. SEZ services exemption under Notification 4/2004 needed verification of authorized operations. Extended limitation period was rejected as no suppression was proven given timely return filing and document submissions. Penalties under Section 78 of Finance Act were set aside. Appeal partially allowed with specific issues remanded for fresh examination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
