Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT set aside service tax demand of Rs.33,04,058 on road construction services, finding them exempt under Notification No.25/2012 for public infrastructure projects funded by government bodies. The Tribunal rejected invocation of extended limitation period, following precedent in G.D. Goenka case, as regular filing of returns indicated no willful suppression. The demand for service tax on legal and manpower supply services (Rs.8,259) was also invalidated due to limitation issues. Consequently, penalties under Sections 78(1) and 77(2) were quashed. The ruling affirmed that road construction for public use, when funded through government channels like DRDA or MP/MLA funds, qualifies for service tax exemption under Entry 13(a) of the notification.
CESTAT set aside service tax demand of Rs.33,04,058 on road construction services, finding them exempt under Notification No.25/2012 for public infrastructure projects funded by government bodies. The Tribunal rejected invocation of extended limitation period, following precedent in G.D. Goenka case, as regular filing of returns indicated no willful suppression. The demand for service tax on legal and manpower supply services (Rs.8,259) was also invalidated due to limitation issues. Consequently, penalties under Sections 78(1) and 77(2) were quashed. The ruling affirmed that road construction for public use, when funded through government channels like DRDA or MP/MLA funds, qualifies for service tax exemption under Entry 13(a) of the notification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
