Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT reversed AO's addition under section 68 regarding alleged bogus long-term capital gains (LTCG). The tribunal found insufficient evidence to reject taxpayer's claim for exemption under section 10(38), as documentary evidence supported genuine share transactions. AO's rejection was based solely on unsubstantiated statements from individuals who were not produced for cross-examination. The related addition of estimated 2% commission was also deleted, as the underlying LTCG transactions were held genuine. CIT(A)'s deletion of additions was upheld, and Revenue's appeal was dismissed due to lack of merit in challenging the authenticity of share transactions.
ITAT reversed AO's addition under section 68 regarding alleged bogus long-term capital gains (LTCG). The tribunal found insufficient evidence to reject taxpayer's claim for exemption under section 10(38), as documentary evidence supported genuine share transactions. AO's rejection was based solely on unsubstantiated statements from individuals who were not produced for cross-examination. The related addition of estimated 2% commission was also deleted, as the underlying LTCG transactions were held genuine. CIT(A)'s deletion of additions was upheld, and Revenue's appeal was dismissed due to lack of merit in challenging the authenticity of share transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.