Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
AT upheld the provisional attachment order under PMLA, dismissing appellants' challenge. The tribunal found authorities had properly recorded satisfaction under sections 5 and 8, rejecting claims of procedural violations. Properties purchased before the predicate offense were validly attached as representing proceeds of crime value. Despite appellants' claim of utilizing funds for legitimate business purposes in April 2008, AT maintained attachment was justified while criminal proceedings remained pending. Properties could be attached regardless of whether appellants were charged with scheduled offenses, as long as evidence showed proceeds of crime connection. The retrospective application of PMLA was deemed constitutionally valid as attachment constitutes civil action. Canara Bank's interests were noted as resolved following loan closure.
AT upheld the provisional attachment order under PMLA, dismissing appellants' challenge. The tribunal found authorities had properly recorded satisfaction under sections 5 and 8, rejecting claims of procedural violations. Properties purchased before the predicate offense were validly attached as representing proceeds of crime value. Despite appellants' claim of utilizing funds for legitimate business purposes in April 2008, AT maintained attachment was justified while criminal proceedings remained pending. Properties could be attached regardless of whether appellants were charged with scheduled offenses, as long as evidence showed proceeds of crime connection. The retrospective application of PMLA was deemed constitutionally valid as attachment constitutes civil action. Canara Bank's interests were noted as resolved following loan closure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.