Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that cancellation of petitioner's GST registration was invalid due to procedural defects and non-application of mind. The initial SCN lacked essential details including name, designation, and signature of the issuing authority. The rejection of revocation application was mechanical, without proper reasoning. Court emphasized that GST registration cancellation, being a drastic measure affecting business operations, requires thorough consideration and cogent reasons. The SCN, cancellation order, and revocation rejection order were set aside as unsustainable. Court restored petitioner's GST registration, noting that such cancellations cannot be executed in a casual manner and must follow principles of natural justice.
HC held that cancellation of petitioner's GST registration was invalid due to procedural defects and non-application of mind. The initial SCN lacked essential details including name, designation, and signature of the issuing authority. The rejection of revocation application was mechanical, without proper reasoning. Court emphasized that GST registration cancellation, being a drastic measure affecting business operations, requires thorough consideration and cogent reasons. The SCN, cancellation order, and revocation rejection order were set aside as unsustainable. Court restored petitioner's GST registration, noting that such cancellations cannot be executed in a casual manner and must follow principles of natural justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.