Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
401 to 420 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC invalidated retrospective GST registration cancellation due to procedural deficiencies in the show cause notice (SCN). The notice failed to indicate any intention of retrospective cancellation or provide supporting reasons, violating principles of natural justice. The Court determined that the absence of prior notice regarding retrospective action and lack of justification rendered the cancellation order legally unsustainable. Consequently, the Court modified the cancellation to take effect prospectively from the SCN date (28 March 2023) rather than retrospectively. The ruling emphasizes the requirement for proper disclosure and reasoning in administrative orders affecting taxpayer rights under GST framework.
HC invalidated retrospective GST registration cancellation due to procedural deficiencies in the show cause notice (SCN). The notice failed to indicate any intention of retrospective cancellation or provide supporting reasons, violating principles of natural justice. The Court determined that the absence of prior notice regarding retrospective action and lack of justification rendered the cancellation order legally unsustainable. Consequently, the Court modified the cancellation to take effect prospectively from the SCN date (28 March 2023) rather than retrospectively. The ruling emphasizes the requirement for proper disclosure and reasoning in administrative orders affecting taxpayer rights under GST framework.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.