Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
HC invalidated retrospective GST registration cancellation due to procedural deficiencies in the show cause notice (SCN). The notice failed to indicate any intention of retrospective cancellation or provide supporting reasons, violating principles of natural justice. The Court determined that the absence of prior notice regarding retrospective action and lack of justification rendered the cancellation order legally unsustainable. Consequently, the Court modified the cancellation to take effect prospectively from the SCN date (28 March 2023) rather than retrospectively. The ruling emphasizes the requirement for proper disclosure and reasoning in administrative orders affecting taxpayer rights under GST framework.
HC invalidated retrospective GST registration cancellation due to procedural deficiencies in the show cause notice (SCN). The notice failed to indicate any intention of retrospective cancellation or provide supporting reasons, violating principles of natural justice. The Court determined that the absence of prior notice regarding retrospective action and lack of justification rendered the cancellation order legally unsustainable. Consequently, the Court modified the cancellation to take effect prospectively from the SCN date (28 March 2023) rather than retrospectively. The ruling emphasizes the requirement for proper disclosure and reasoning in administrative orders affecting taxpayer rights under GST framework.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
