Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC affirmed issuance of mandamus under Article 226 where RBI failed to exercise statutory powers regarding ECL's regulatory violations. Court established that vesting of statutory power upon public authority implies duty, enforceable through writ jurisdiction. Parallel NCLT proceedings did not bar HC's constitutional jurisdiction to direct RBI's exercise of powers under RBI Act, specifically Sections 45-IE and 45MA. HC maintained its authority to issue protective interim orders based on RBI's findings of ECL's regulatory breaches. Court emphasized that NCLT lacks jurisdiction to issue prerogative writs directing RBI's statutory functions. Appeal challenging writ maintainability dismissed, upholding HC's constitutional mandate to ensure statutory authorities fulfill prescribed duties.
HC affirmed issuance of mandamus under Article 226 where RBI failed to exercise statutory powers regarding ECL's regulatory violations. Court established that vesting of statutory power upon public authority implies duty, enforceable through writ jurisdiction. Parallel NCLT proceedings did not bar HC's constitutional jurisdiction to direct RBI's exercise of powers under RBI Act, specifically Sections 45-IE and 45MA. HC maintained its authority to issue protective interim orders based on RBI's findings of ECL's regulatory breaches. Court emphasized that NCLT lacks jurisdiction to issue prerogative writs directing RBI's statutory functions. Appeal challenging writ maintainability dismissed, upholding HC's constitutional mandate to ensure statutory authorities fulfill prescribed duties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
