Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT ruled on NCLT's authority to modify resolution plans under IBC. Court held NCLT's powers do not extend to examining CoC's commercial wisdom or conducting quantitative analysis for specific creditors when mandatory requirements are met. Resolution plan approved with 79.10% voting share was deemed valid. NCLT lacks jurisdiction to direct distribution of recoverable amounts among creditors while approving plans. Regarding dissenting financial creditor's standing, NCLAT followed SC precedent that such creditors cannot challenge CoC-approved plans unless proceeds fall below Section 53(1) entitlements. Appeals by dissenting creditor dismissed as afterthought, noting their prior participation in CoC meetings and negotiations. Original modifications to resolution plan set aside in related appeals.
NCLAT ruled on NCLT's authority to modify resolution plans under IBC. Court held NCLT's powers do not extend to examining CoC's commercial wisdom or conducting quantitative analysis for specific creditors when mandatory requirements are met. Resolution plan approved with 79.10% voting share was deemed valid. NCLT lacks jurisdiction to direct distribution of recoverable amounts among creditors while approving plans. Regarding dissenting financial creditor's standing, NCLAT followed SC precedent that such creditors cannot challenge CoC-approved plans unless proceeds fall below Section 53(1) entitlements. Appeals by dissenting creditor dismissed as afterthought, noting their prior participation in CoC meetings and negotiations. Original modifications to resolution plan set aside in related appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
