Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Objective characteristics govern magnesium bis-glycinate chelate classification as an amino-acid coordination compound, not a food preparation or anti...
Independent professional certification requires pleaded knowledge or complicity for criminal liability; untimely complaints remain barred by limitatio...
HC set aside impugned orders related to GST assessment and rectification petition under Section 161 of GST Act due to lack of reasoned decision-making and violation of natural justice principles. The original orders failed to address petitioner's objections with proper justification. Respondent authority committed to conducting fresh assessment with due process. Court mandated issuance of speaking order after providing reasonable hearing opportunity to petitioner, considering their reply and supporting documentation. Matter remanded for reassessment in compliance with procedural fairness requirements.
HC set aside impugned orders related to GST assessment and rectification petition under Section 161 of GST Act due to lack of reasoned decision-making and violation of natural justice principles. The original orders failed to address petitioner's objections with proper justification. Respondent authority committed to conducting fresh assessment with due process. Court mandated issuance of speaking order after providing reasonable hearing opportunity to petitioner, considering their reply and supporting documentation. Matter remanded for reassessment in compliance with procedural fairness requirements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.