Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
HC set aside impugned orders related to GST assessment and rectification petition under Section 161 of GST Act due to lack of reasoned decision-making and violation of natural justice principles. The original orders failed to address petitioner's objections with proper justification. Respondent authority committed to conducting fresh assessment with due process. Court mandated issuance of speaking order after providing reasonable hearing opportunity to petitioner, considering their reply and supporting documentation. Matter remanded for reassessment in compliance with procedural fairness requirements.
HC set aside impugned orders related to GST assessment and rectification petition under Section 161 of GST Act due to lack of reasoned decision-making and violation of natural justice principles. The original orders failed to address petitioner's objections with proper justification. Respondent authority committed to conducting fresh assessment with due process. Court mandated issuance of speaking order after providing reasonable hearing opportunity to petitioner, considering their reply and supporting documentation. Matter remanded for reassessment in compliance with procedural fairness requirements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.