Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld reopening under s.147 regarding inadequate consideration for immovable property purchase. Original assessment under s.143(1) had not examined the land purchase deed, constituting valid grounds for reassessment. On merits, addition under s.56(2)(vii)(b) was sustained as assessee failed to provide evidence of sale deed cancellation. Though assessee claimed cancellation was in process and produced co-purchaser's confirmation of non-payment, absence of seller's confirmation and non-refund of stamp duty indicated continuing validity of agreement. No change of opinion by AO was found. ITAT dismissed assessee's appeal, confirming additions made by AO and upheld by CIT(A).
ITAT upheld reopening under s.147 regarding inadequate consideration for immovable property purchase. Original assessment under s.143(1) had not examined the land purchase deed, constituting valid grounds for reassessment. On merits, addition under s.56(2)(vii)(b) was sustained as assessee failed to provide evidence of sale deed cancellation. Though assessee claimed cancellation was in process and produced co-purchaser's confirmation of non-payment, absence of seller's confirmation and non-refund of stamp duty indicated continuing validity of agreement. No change of opinion by AO was found. ITAT dismissed assessee's appeal, confirming additions made by AO and upheld by CIT(A).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.