Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal against CIT(A)'s order invalidating reassessment proceedings under s.147. AO had previously examined share premium issue during original scrutiny assessment under s.143(3) and determined s.56(2)(viib) inapplicable. Reopening was based on identical issues without fresh tangible material, constituting mere change of opinion. AO failed to consider material facts including financial statements, assessment queries, written replies, and High Court-approved amalgamation scheme. AO incorrectly stated assessee issued shares to amalgamating company when shares were issued to shareholders of amalgamating company. Reassessment invalid as initiated without new information and based solely on change of opinion.
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal against CIT(A)'s order invalidating reassessment proceedings under s.147. AO had previously examined share premium issue during original scrutiny assessment under s.143(3) and determined s.56(2)(viib) inapplicable. Reopening was based on identical issues without fresh tangible material, constituting mere change of opinion. AO failed to consider material facts including financial statements, assessment queries, written replies, and High Court-approved amalgamation scheme. AO incorrectly stated assessee issued shares to amalgamating company when shares were issued to shareholders of amalgamating company. Reassessment invalid as initiated without new information and based solely on change of opinion.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
