Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal on multiple grounds. AO's adoption of Rs. 3,000/sq.ft. as commercial space sale price was rejected due to lack of concrete evidence beyond mere statements. The tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s decision on reimbursement of expenditure, following precedent that Revenue cannot take contrary positions among group assessees. Addition for out-of-court settlement amount was deleted as it would result in double taxation since Rs. 83 lakhs was already declared as income. Regarding expenditure on commercial space sale, CIT(A)'s deletion of addition was sustained as expenses were properly documented through banking channels. Revenue's objection about remand report was dismissed as available evidence was sufficient for determination.
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal on multiple grounds. AO's adoption of Rs. 3,000/sq.ft. as commercial space sale price was rejected due to lack of concrete evidence beyond mere statements. The tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s decision on reimbursement of expenditure, following precedent that Revenue cannot take contrary positions among group assessees. Addition for out-of-court settlement amount was deleted as it would result in double taxation since Rs. 83 lakhs was already declared as income. Regarding expenditure on commercial space sale, CIT(A)'s deletion of addition was sustained as expenses were properly documented through banking channels. Revenue's objection about remand report was dismissed as available evidence was sufficient for determination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
