Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT upheld the sale of Corporate Debtor (CD) as a going concern in liquidation proceedings. The sale, conducted on 28.08.2023, complied with amended Regulation 32A(4) of IBBI Liquidation Process Regulations, requiring first-attempt sale without 90-day timeline restriction. The successful bidder's purchase price exceeded reserve price, and proceeds were distributed per Section 53 of IBC. The Tribunal's dismissal of application and adverse observations against liquidator were deemed erroneous. Applying clean slate theory, NCLAT confirmed that CD sale as going concern requires freedom from prior unpaid liabilities, with sale proceeds distributed to stakeholders. Petition allowed, validating liquidator's actions in executing compliant going-concern sale.
NCLAT upheld the sale of Corporate Debtor (CD) as a going concern in liquidation proceedings. The sale, conducted on 28.08.2023, complied with amended Regulation 32A(4) of IBBI Liquidation Process Regulations, requiring first-attempt sale without 90-day timeline restriction. The successful bidder's purchase price exceeded reserve price, and proceeds were distributed per Section 53 of IBC. The Tribunal's dismissal of application and adverse observations against liquidator were deemed erroneous. Applying clean slate theory, NCLAT confirmed that CD sale as going concern requires freedom from prior unpaid liabilities, with sale proceeds distributed to stakeholders. Petition allowed, validating liquidator's actions in executing compliant going-concern sale.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.