Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC upheld the Department's right to proceed with CENVAT credit assessment despite quashed show cause notice. The initial ruling specifically permitted authorities to continue proceedings to exclude value of free materials used by Assessee, following established precedent. Both adjudicating authority and CESTAT erred in interpreting that quashed SCN precluded adjudication of other demands. The Court clarified that remaining demands require factual adjudication per law, emphasizing that original Division Bench order explicitly allowed Department to proceed with value exclusion determination under Central Excise Act provisions.
HC upheld the Department's right to proceed with CENVAT credit assessment despite quashed show cause notice. The initial ruling specifically permitted authorities to continue proceedings to exclude value of free materials used by Assessee, following established precedent. Both adjudicating authority and CESTAT erred in interpreting that quashed SCN precluded adjudication of other demands. The Court clarified that remaining demands require factual adjudication per law, emphasizing that original Division Bench order explicitly allowed Department to proceed with value exclusion determination under Central Excise Act provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.