Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT remanded several issues back to AO for verification including disallowances under sections 14A, 43B, and 35. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal regarding signing amount of grant received, treating it as a liability pending project execution. Foreign commission expenditure was ruled in favor of the assessee, finding no TDS applicability under section 195 as services were rendered outside India. Exchange fluctuation matters were restored to AO for examination under section 43A to determine treatment of capital assets versus WIP. Section 35(2AB) deduction claim was remanded for verification of DSIR approval and compliance. The Tribunal emphasized proper verification of evidence and mandated opportunity of hearing following principles of natural justice across remanded issues.
ITAT remanded several issues back to AO for verification including disallowances under sections 14A, 43B, and 35. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal regarding signing amount of grant received, treating it as a liability pending project execution. Foreign commission expenditure was ruled in favor of the assessee, finding no TDS applicability under section 195 as services were rendered outside India. Exchange fluctuation matters were restored to AO for examination under section 43A to determine treatment of capital assets versus WIP. Section 35(2AB) deduction claim was remanded for verification of DSIR approval and compliance. The Tribunal emphasized proper verification of evidence and mandated opportunity of hearing following principles of natural justice across remanded issues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.