Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC ruled in favor of mobile phone exporters, holding that unlocking/activation of phones for overseas markets does not constitute "taken into use" under Rule 3 of Duty Drawback Rules. The court determined that configuration processes - whether through SIM insertion or air-activation - merely enable geographical functionality without engaging the device's multifarious capabilities. This interpretation preserves exporters' rights to duty drawbacks under Section 75 of Customs Act, supporting export competitiveness. The court quashed CBIC's contrary clarifications, emphasizing that export benefits should be construed favorably for exporters when ambiguous. This ruling particularly benefits India's growing mobile manufacturing sector by maintaining drawback eligibility despite pre-export configuration requirements.
HC ruled in favor of mobile phone exporters, holding that unlocking/activation of phones for overseas markets does not constitute "taken into use" under Rule 3 of Duty Drawback Rules. The court determined that configuration processes - whether through SIM insertion or air-activation - merely enable geographical functionality without engaging the device's multifarious capabilities. This interpretation preserves exporters' rights to duty drawbacks under Section 75 of Customs Act, supporting export competitiveness. The court quashed CBIC's contrary clarifications, emphasizing that export benefits should be construed favorably for exporters when ambiguous. This ruling particularly benefits India's growing mobile manufacturing sector by maintaining drawback eligibility despite pre-export configuration requirements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.