Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT allowed appeal concerning refund of excess CENVAT credit of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess during GST transition period. The tribunal held that Section 142(3) and 142(9)(b) of CGST Act, 2017, as transitional provisions, override contrary provisions in existing law except Section 11B(2) of Central Excise Act. The phrase 'duty of excise' under Section 11B(2)(d) includes CENVAT credit. The tribunal rejected lower authority's contention that Rule 5 of CCR does not provide for cash refund of excess credit. Since appellants demonstrated no unjust enrichment and maintained proper records, refund of Rs.25,52,385/- was granted under transitional provisions of CGST Act.
CESTAT allowed appeal concerning refund of excess CENVAT credit of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess during GST transition period. The tribunal held that Section 142(3) and 142(9)(b) of CGST Act, 2017, as transitional provisions, override contrary provisions in existing law except Section 11B(2) of Central Excise Act. The phrase 'duty of excise' under Section 11B(2)(d) includes CENVAT credit. The tribunal rejected lower authority's contention that Rule 5 of CCR does not provide for cash refund of excess credit. Since appellants demonstrated no unjust enrichment and maintained proper records, refund of Rs.25,52,385/- was granted under transitional provisions of CGST Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
