Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upheld the AO's decision to treat one-time life membership and institutional membership fees as non-corpus funds, making them ineligible for exemption under Section 11(1)(d). The Tribunal determined these fees were not voluntary contributions, rendering irrelevant whether they were specifically directed to form part of the corpus fund or their revenue/capital nature. The receipts were classified as income from property held under trust, with the AO permitting a 15% set-apart allowance. The appellant's challenge was dismissed, affirming that such membership fees must be included in the assessee's taxable income.
ITAT upheld the AO's decision to treat one-time life membership and institutional membership fees as non-corpus funds, making them ineligible for exemption under Section 11(1)(d). The Tribunal determined these fees were not voluntary contributions, rendering irrelevant whether they were specifically directed to form part of the corpus fund or their revenue/capital nature. The receipts were classified as income from property held under trust, with the AO permitting a 15% set-apart allowance. The appellant's challenge was dismissed, affirming that such membership fees must be included in the assessee's taxable income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.