Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging the rejection of a new resolution plan submission. The tribunal held that once a resolution plan is approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and pending before the Adjudicating Authority, the CoC cannot entertain alternative plans. The CoC's approval creates a binding relationship between the CoC and Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA), even prior to the Adjudicating Authority's final approval. The appellant's argument regarding SRA's non-existence due to JV partner withdrawal was insufficient to override this principle. The tribunal affirmed established precedent that CoC lacks authority to consider new resolution plans after approving one that awaits adjudication.
NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging the rejection of a new resolution plan submission. The tribunal held that once a resolution plan is approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and pending before the Adjudicating Authority, the CoC cannot entertain alternative plans. The CoC's approval creates a binding relationship between the CoC and Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA), even prior to the Adjudicating Authority's final approval. The appellant's argument regarding SRA's non-existence due to JV partner withdrawal was insufficient to override this principle. The tribunal affirmed established precedent that CoC lacks authority to consider new resolution plans after approving one that awaits adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
