Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
HC upheld validity of assessment order under s.147 read with s.144B, finding proper approval under s.151. Court confirmed Range Head and CIT/PCIT had appropriately endorsed AO's recorded reasons for scrutiny notice under s.148. Review of computerized order details demonstrated requisite approvals obtained at each stage of faceless assessment. Finding no jurisdictional error, HC declined to exercise writ jurisdiction. Petitioner directed to pursue statutory appeal remedy for AY 2013-14, with time spent in writ proceedings eligible for consideration in any delay condonation application.
HC upheld validity of assessment order under s.147 read with s.144B, finding proper approval under s.151. Court confirmed Range Head and CIT/PCIT had appropriately endorsed AO's recorded reasons for scrutiny notice under s.148. Review of computerized order details demonstrated requisite approvals obtained at each stage of faceless assessment. Finding no jurisdictional error, HC declined to exercise writ jurisdiction. Petitioner directed to pursue statutory appeal remedy for AY 2013-14, with time spent in writ proceedings eligible for consideration in any delay condonation application.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
