Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
HC quashed reassessment notice under s.148 concerning lease payments, foreign currency transactions, and goodwill depreciation. Court found no valid grounds for reopening as lease transactions were consistently accepted since 2012-13, foreign currency claims were properly explained with unrealized gains/losses appropriately reflected in income computation, and goodwill depreciation claim was valid as s.43(6)(c) amendment denying such depreciation became effective only from 01.04.2021. AO's attempt to reopen assessment demonstrated mere change of opinion without fresh tangible material, failing to establish income escapement. Court held AO lacked jurisdiction to reopen assessment, ruling in assessee's favor.
HC quashed reassessment notice under s.148 concerning lease payments, foreign currency transactions, and goodwill depreciation. Court found no valid grounds for reopening as lease transactions were consistently accepted since 2012-13, foreign currency claims were properly explained with unrealized gains/losses appropriately reflected in income computation, and goodwill depreciation claim was valid as s.43(6)(c) amendment denying such depreciation became effective only from 01.04.2021. AO's attempt to reopen assessment demonstrated mere change of opinion without fresh tangible material, failing to establish income escapement. Court held AO lacked jurisdiction to reopen assessment, ruling in assessee's favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.