Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC quashed reassessment notice under s.148 concerning lease payments, foreign currency transactions, and goodwill depreciation. Court found no valid grounds for reopening as lease transactions were consistently accepted since 2012-13, foreign currency claims were properly explained with unrealized gains/losses appropriately reflected in income computation, and goodwill depreciation claim was valid as s.43(6)(c) amendment denying such depreciation became effective only from 01.04.2021. AO's attempt to reopen assessment demonstrated mere change of opinion without fresh tangible material, failing to establish income escapement. Court held AO lacked jurisdiction to reopen assessment, ruling in assessee's favor.
HC quashed reassessment notice under s.148 concerning lease payments, foreign currency transactions, and goodwill depreciation. Court found no valid grounds for reopening as lease transactions were consistently accepted since 2012-13, foreign currency claims were properly explained with unrealized gains/losses appropriately reflected in income computation, and goodwill depreciation claim was valid as s.43(6)(c) amendment denying such depreciation became effective only from 01.04.2021. AO's attempt to reopen assessment demonstrated mere change of opinion without fresh tangible material, failing to establish income escapement. Court held AO lacked jurisdiction to reopen assessment, ruling in assessee's favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.