Charitable registration turns on predominant purpose and genuine activities, while incidental fees and related-party rent require supporting adverse m...
MAT book-profit adjustments exclude disallowances for exempt-income expenditure and demerger expenditure unless expressly listed under the statutory c...
Omitted specified domestic transaction provision invalidates related-party expenditure transfer-pricing references and assessments based on consequent...
Preventive suspension requires an immediate continuing threat and cannot become indefinite without inquiry, fresh evidence, or proportionate safeguard...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
261 to 280 of 96000 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC quashed reassessment notice under s.148 concerning lease payments, foreign currency transactions, and goodwill depreciation. Court found no valid grounds for reopening as lease transactions were consistently accepted since 2012-13, foreign currency claims were properly explained with unrealized gains/losses appropriately reflected in income computation, and goodwill depreciation claim was valid as s.43(6)(c) amendment denying such depreciation became effective only from 01.04.2021. AO's attempt to reopen assessment demonstrated mere change of opinion without fresh tangible material, failing to establish income escapement. Court held AO lacked jurisdiction to reopen assessment, ruling in assessee's favor.
HC quashed reassessment notice under s.148 concerning lease payments, foreign currency transactions, and goodwill depreciation. Court found no valid grounds for reopening as lease transactions were consistently accepted since 2012-13, foreign currency claims were properly explained with unrealized gains/losses appropriately reflected in income computation, and goodwill depreciation claim was valid as s.43(6)(c) amendment denying such depreciation became effective only from 01.04.2021. AO's attempt to reopen assessment demonstrated mere change of opinion without fresh tangible material, failing to establish income escapement. Court held AO lacked jurisdiction to reopen assessment, ruling in assessee's favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.