Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
ITAT modified profit margins for undisclosed income in hotel/restaurant and real estate businesses following search and seizure action. For hotel/restaurant operations, tribunal reduced profit margin from 50% to 40% based on historical book profits ranging from 31-47%. For real estate transactions, margin lowered from 17% to 13% considering actual profit ratios. Regarding unsecured loans under Section 68, ITAT reversed CIT(A)'s deletion and upheld AO's additions, citing absence of incriminating materials during search and applying Abhisar Buildwell precedent. Court emphasized that seized materials must be considered in totality, rejecting selective interpretation, and maintained that only real income can be taxed following Godhra Electricity principles.
ITAT modified profit margins for undisclosed income in hotel/restaurant and real estate businesses following search and seizure action. For hotel/restaurant operations, tribunal reduced profit margin from 50% to 40% based on historical book profits ranging from 31-47%. For real estate transactions, margin lowered from 17% to 13% considering actual profit ratios. Regarding unsecured loans under Section 68, ITAT reversed CIT(A)'s deletion and upheld AO's additions, citing absence of incriminating materials during search and applying Abhisar Buildwell precedent. Court emphasized that seized materials must be considered in totality, rejecting selective interpretation, and maintained that only real income can be taxed following Godhra Electricity principles.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
