Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
ITAT modified profit margins for undisclosed income in hotel/restaurant and real estate businesses following search and seizure action. For hotel/restaurant operations, tribunal reduced profit margin from 50% to 40% based on historical book profits ranging from 31-47%. For real estate transactions, margin lowered from 17% to 13% considering actual profit ratios. Regarding unsecured loans under Section 68, ITAT reversed CIT(A)'s deletion and upheld AO's additions, citing absence of incriminating materials during search and applying Abhisar Buildwell precedent. Court emphasized that seized materials must be considered in totality, rejecting selective interpretation, and maintained that only real income can be taxed following Godhra Electricity principles.
ITAT modified profit margins for undisclosed income in hotel/restaurant and real estate businesses following search and seizure action. For hotel/restaurant operations, tribunal reduced profit margin from 50% to 40% based on historical book profits ranging from 31-47%. For real estate transactions, margin lowered from 17% to 13% considering actual profit ratios. Regarding unsecured loans under Section 68, ITAT reversed CIT(A)'s deletion and upheld AO's additions, citing absence of incriminating materials during search and applying Abhisar Buildwell precedent. Court emphasized that seized materials must be considered in totality, rejecting selective interpretation, and maintained that only real income can be taxed following Godhra Electricity principles.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
