Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT modified profit margins for undisclosed income in hotel/restaurant and real estate businesses following search and seizure action. For hotel/restaurant operations, tribunal reduced profit margin from 50% to 40% based on historical book profits ranging from 31-47%. For real estate transactions, margin lowered from 17% to 13% considering actual profit ratios. Regarding unsecured loans under Section 68, ITAT reversed CIT(A)'s deletion and upheld AO's additions, citing absence of incriminating materials during search and applying Abhisar Buildwell precedent. Court emphasized that seized materials must be considered in totality, rejecting selective interpretation, and maintained that only real income can be taxed following Godhra Electricity principles.
ITAT modified profit margins for undisclosed income in hotel/restaurant and real estate businesses following search and seizure action. For hotel/restaurant operations, tribunal reduced profit margin from 50% to 40% based on historical book profits ranging from 31-47%. For real estate transactions, margin lowered from 17% to 13% considering actual profit ratios. Regarding unsecured loans under Section 68, ITAT reversed CIT(A)'s deletion and upheld AO's additions, citing absence of incriminating materials during search and applying Abhisar Buildwell precedent. Court emphasized that seized materials must be considered in totality, rejecting selective interpretation, and maintained that only real income can be taxed following Godhra Electricity principles.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
