Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant regarding share capital additions under Section 68. The tribunal found that since cash receipts and corresponding credits occurred in the previous assessment year, no additions could be made in the current year based on share allotment. For AY 2017-18, the issuance of 1,50,000 shares to A Co. was deemed legitimate as the company demonstrated sufficient operational revenue (Rs. 15.49 Cr), trading activities, and adequate shareholder funds. The shares were issued at the same premium rate as existing shareholders, supported by a Rule 11UA valuation report. The appellant satisfied all requirements under Section 68, establishing the nature and source of share capital. The appeal was allowed, reversing the AO's additions.
ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant regarding share capital additions under Section 68. The tribunal found that since cash receipts and corresponding credits occurred in the previous assessment year, no additions could be made in the current year based on share allotment. For AY 2017-18, the issuance of 1,50,000 shares to A Co. was deemed legitimate as the company demonstrated sufficient operational revenue (Rs. 15.49 Cr), trading activities, and adequate shareholder funds. The shares were issued at the same premium rate as existing shareholders, supported by a Rule 11UA valuation report. The appellant satisfied all requirements under Section 68, establishing the nature and source of share capital. The appeal was allowed, reversing the AO's additions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
