Minimum alternate tax exclusions for pre-amendment banking companies and expatriate Indian branch salaries remain outside head office expenditure limi...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1201 to 1220 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant regarding share capital additions under Section 68. The tribunal found that since cash receipts and corresponding credits occurred in the previous assessment year, no additions could be made in the current year based on share allotment. For AY 2017-18, the issuance of 1,50,000 shares to A Co. was deemed legitimate as the company demonstrated sufficient operational revenue (Rs. 15.49 Cr), trading activities, and adequate shareholder funds. The shares were issued at the same premium rate as existing shareholders, supported by a Rule 11UA valuation report. The appellant satisfied all requirements under Section 68, establishing the nature and source of share capital. The appeal was allowed, reversing the AO's additions.
ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant regarding share capital additions under Section 68. The tribunal found that since cash receipts and corresponding credits occurred in the previous assessment year, no additions could be made in the current year based on share allotment. For AY 2017-18, the issuance of 1,50,000 shares to A Co. was deemed legitimate as the company demonstrated sufficient operational revenue (Rs. 15.49 Cr), trading activities, and adequate shareholder funds. The shares were issued at the same premium rate as existing shareholders, supported by a Rule 11UA valuation report. The appellant satisfied all requirements under Section 68, establishing the nature and source of share capital. The appeal was allowed, reversing the AO's additions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
