Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant regarding share capital additions under Section 68. The tribunal found that since cash receipts and corresponding credits occurred in the previous assessment year, no additions could be made in the current year based on share allotment. For AY 2017-18, the issuance of 1,50,000 shares to A Co. was deemed legitimate as the company demonstrated sufficient operational revenue (Rs. 15.49 Cr), trading activities, and adequate shareholder funds. The shares were issued at the same premium rate as existing shareholders, supported by a Rule 11UA valuation report. The appellant satisfied all requirements under Section 68, establishing the nature and source of share capital. The appeal was allowed, reversing the AO's additions.
ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant regarding share capital additions under Section 68. The tribunal found that since cash receipts and corresponding credits occurred in the previous assessment year, no additions could be made in the current year based on share allotment. For AY 2017-18, the issuance of 1,50,000 shares to A Co. was deemed legitimate as the company demonstrated sufficient operational revenue (Rs. 15.49 Cr), trading activities, and adequate shareholder funds. The shares were issued at the same premium rate as existing shareholders, supported by a Rule 11UA valuation report. The appellant satisfied all requirements under Section 68, establishing the nature and source of share capital. The appeal was allowed, reversing the AO's additions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
