Administrative fraud classification suspension does not halt independent criminal investigation or warrant-based searches into alleged economic offenc...
Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
821 to 840 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT ruled on classification dispute regarding Light Green Float Glass imports. The appellant sought classification under CTI 7005 10 10 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975, qualifying for basic customs duty exemption under 01.06.2011 notification. Examining test reports from CSIR Kolkata confirming presence of absorbent layer on tin side (fluorescent under UV illumination), CESTAT upheld previous Commissioner (Appeals) order classifying goods under CTI 7005 10 10. The Tribunal determined that goods satisfied conditions of Note 2(c) of Chapter 70, rejecting department's contention for classification under CTI 7005 21 10. Appeal dismissed, confirming classification under CTI 7005 10 10 with applicable duty exemption benefits.
CESTAT ruled on classification dispute regarding Light Green Float Glass imports. The appellant sought classification under CTI 7005 10 10 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975, qualifying for basic customs duty exemption under 01.06.2011 notification. Examining test reports from CSIR Kolkata confirming presence of absorbent layer on tin side (fluorescent under UV illumination), CESTAT upheld previous Commissioner (Appeals) order classifying goods under CTI 7005 10 10. The Tribunal determined that goods satisfied conditions of Note 2(c) of Chapter 70, rejecting department's contention for classification under CTI 7005 21 10. Appeal dismissed, confirming classification under CTI 7005 10 10 with applicable duty exemption benefits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.