Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1381 to 1400 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC granted a 90-day extension to the Company for listing shares on the nationwide stock exchange, overriding SEBI's earlier orders. The ruling emphasized courts should adopt a liberal approach in time extension matters rather than a pedantic stance. The decision considered that no shareholders had raised grievances, and the Company provided reasonable explanations for previous delays, which SEBI and NSE had accepted until 30.09.2023. The extension was granted under Article 226, with the condition that failure to comply within the stipulated timeframe would result in reinstatement of SEBI's original orders. The judgment prioritized shareholder protection while balancing regulatory compliance requirements.
HC granted a 90-day extension to the Company for listing shares on the nationwide stock exchange, overriding SEBI's earlier orders. The ruling emphasized courts should adopt a liberal approach in time extension matters rather than a pedantic stance. The decision considered that no shareholders had raised grievances, and the Company provided reasonable explanations for previous delays, which SEBI and NSE had accepted until 30.09.2023. The extension was granted under Article 226, with the condition that failure to comply within the stipulated timeframe would result in reinstatement of SEBI's original orders. The judgment prioritized shareholder protection while balancing regulatory compliance requirements.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
